![]() |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
Welcome to the The ProgrammersTalk Community forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
![]() | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes | ![]() |
| |
| |||
| J# is often regarded as Microsoft's idea of a stepping stone from Java to .NET. It is supposed to be Java in fact. If I search for "define:J#" on Google, I get a Spanish result which contains the following: Quote:
|
| |||
| J# actually started as J++. J# became J# when .NET was released. It is actually Microsoft Visual J#.NET. However, because J# was originally created as a .NET language from the beginning, just as C# was, the .NET name is dropped off, as is the "Visual" part since J# and C# both started from Microsoft, who developed the Visual <application> products. For things like Visual Basic and Visual C++, they didn't change name, so the .NET is not left off because if it were, it would create confusion. The same is true of ASP and ASP.NET as well as ADO and ADO.NET |
| |||
| ADO = ActiveX Data Objects |
| The Following User Says Thank You to rpgfan3233 For This Useful Post: | ||
HelloWorld (07-09-2007) | ||
| |||
| I haven't heard of anyone using J#. So I have to believe that it is on its way to becoming completely obsolete. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |