Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutter Aren't the crack methods for SHA1 and MD5 just going through combinations of characters hoping for a string that has the same hash as the actual password? |
Yes, but generally in some kind of optimized way to reduce the amount of work required.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutter In that case, isn't SHA1 more secure because it simply has a longer hash and would be less likely to have two strings match? |
SHA1 is more secure than MD5 and a careful reading of my previous post will show that I implied that. Using the same logic SHA256 is more secure than SHA1 and SHA512 is more secure than those others. Hence my recommendation for using those more secure methods.
I think you may have just gotten confused about what I was saying.